Cooper&Wright vs bugstack
Both turn a production error into a pull request with the fix, and both leave the merge to you unless you say otherwise. bugstack is built around the crash. Cooper&Wright is built around the pull request: it stays on the ones it opens until their checks are green, and on the ones your team and Dependabot open too.
- Where errors come from
- Its own SDK, or Sentry or Datadog.
- Sentry.
- Pull requests it works on
- The ones it opens, and package upgrades.
- The ones it opens, the ones people open, and Dependabot's.
- When checks fail
- Failing CI is one of the things it fixes.
- Reads the failing job's log and pushes a fix, up to three rounds, then stops and writes down why.
- Merging
- Draft, review, or merging proven fixes on its own, per repository.
- You merge its fixes. Dependabot's pull requests merge once every check is green, behind the gate you choose.
- When you overrule it
- It answers review comments on its pull request.
- It reads your fix against its own and keeps the rule for next time.
- Stacks
- JavaScript, Python, Go and Ruby.
- Rails, Laravel, Django, FastAPI, Flutter and dozens more.
- Price
- $100 a month, usage credit included.
- Free while in beta, no card.
bugstack's column is what bugstack's own site says, as of October 2026. If it has changed, write to us and we will fix this page.
Which one fits
If you want crash fixes merged without you, on JavaScript, Python, Go or Ruby, bugstack does that. If your errors are already in Sentry and the work that piles up is pull requests sitting red, Cooper&Wright is built for that: every pull request in the repository, not only its own.